The President of the BCSO shall:
The Vice-president of the BCSO shall:
The Secretary-treasurer shall:
(The line officers plus the two immediate past presidents)
In order to comply with By-law 29 of the Constitution of the BCSO there must be five directors.These include the Officers; the President, the Vice-president, the Secretary-treasurer and the two previous Past Presidents. The duties of the President, Vice-president, and Secretary-treasurer are outlined above. As directors the two Past Presidents shall;
Formerly the Pre-Paid Dental Plan Committee; (Struck Feb. 1970)
The purpose of this committee shall be to represent the interests of the members of the BCSO in their dealings with patients who have prepaid orthodontic insurance. This committee shall:
(Discontinued 2003 when NIHB centralized their screening process) Currently all FNIHB concerns are dealt with through the Insurance Committee.
This representative was to:
(Formerly the Cleft Palate Negotiations Committee; Struck June 1973)
This representative shall:
The representative shall:
(Formerly the Committee for Expanded Duties of Dental Auxiliaries)
This committee shall;
This representative shall:
This representative shall:
(Struck November 1967)
This representative shall:
(Struck April 1976)
The Code of Ethics of the British Columbia Dental Association will govern the professional activities of the members of the BCSO.
This Committee shall:
(Formerly the Peer Review Committee; Struck March 1974)
This representative is automatically a member of the Ethics Committee of the BCSO, and shall:
(Struck October 1972)
This representative shall:
(Struck October 1992) (in 2009, this evolved to the Website Development and Website maintenance)
This committee consists of a member manual representative and the members of the executive. This representative shall:
This representative shall:
(First appointed September 2009)
The CAO has developed a National HELPLINE so the CAO head office can field calls year the public. In situations where the CAO staff is unable to answer the questions or solve the problem, they may choose to refer the person to a CAO HELPLINE Representative from their respective province. This representative shall:
(Formerly the BCSO Examiners for B.C. Specialty Exams (Ortho); Struck April 1976), Disbanded 2001 as the RCDC now gives the Specialty Exam
This committee shall consist of a chairman and two other members. The term of office of all members shall normally be three years, unless re-appointed by consent of the membership of the BCSO at large. (In order to preserve the continuity, it is recommended that the term of office of the three officers each be staggered by one year).
This committee shall:
This page is included to re-affirm and explain a long standing policy of the orthodontic community in British Columbia. The policy is a simple one.
Namely that orthodontic specialists in B.C. and elsewhere in Canada should deal directly with their patients on financial matters. We are against direct assignment of fees from the insurance carrier to the practitioner.
This policy is supported by the BCSO and has been along standing policy of organized dentistry in Canada, including the Canadian Dental Association. Until recent years, orthodontists have stood solidly behind it. A recent survey of our members suggests that this policy is again in need of promotion, explanation and endorsement so that our members clearly understand that we would all be better off in the long run if we stand united against direct assignment of benefits from carrier to orthodontist. It is easy to understand the arguments that have led some orthodontists to disregard this stand and accept assignment:
There are a lot of possible reasons that may influence people to accept assignment. Let's re-examine the guts of the issue.
The contract we establish when we initiate treatment is between the professional and the patient or parent. We do not have a contract with an insurance carrier. We should not be establishing or modifying our proposed treatment plans in any way based on the insurance a patient has available. We should not be establishing or modifying fees in any way according to the coverage a patient has available. We have an obligation to assist the patient in every way to take the maximum advantage of their benefits; however, we are not treating or entering into a contract with a dental plan.
We have a unique opportunity to avoid some of the pitfalls of direct assignment. If we don't control our own destiny by firmly establishing that our contractual arrangements are with our patients, we run the risk of slowly loosing our identity and our ability to maintain control over such fundamental areas as treatment planning and fee structures. Do you really want to get to a stage where a corporation tells you what you can and can't do and what your fee is going to be? This scenario is not farfetched when one looks at the battles that have been fought provincially and nationally to maintain the integrity of our profession in the face of increasing third party pressures.
When you get right down to it, you won't lose many, (if any), patients. You won't have that many more problems with respect to payment of accounts. It really comes down to whether this is a principle worth preserving. It is important to take the long view and protect our fundamental way of practice not only for ourselves but for those who want to practice quality orthodontics in the future. We are also acting in the best interests of the patient. They are, after all, the people who deserve the very highest standard of care. They are getting it now. Let's keep it that way. Think about it.
-BCSO Insurance Committee
The BCSO has a two-tiered annual membership dues structure. The Participating dues are for members who attend one or more of the four meetings throughout the year. The higher dues over the non-participating dues are allocated to the meeting function meals. The Non-Participating dues are for those members who do not attend the meetings - traditionally, for people who do not live near enough to come to meetings.
It is important to note that both members in both categories have identical rights and powers.
The dues have remained modest over the years and historically are as follows:
In 2012, by a majority vote, the BCSO instituted a shift to increase our presence on the interweb with a brand new website, with both a public site and members only site. The public site was overhauled to provide accurate and up-to-date information about our organization, and our specialty. The members only site was created to allow improved access for members to pertinent documents and membership information. As part of the vote, each BCSO member contributed a levy of $350 for the new interweb program. All new applying members, and renewing members who have not yet paid the levy, will be required to make the one-time contribution of $350 to the ongoing development and maintenance of the interweb program, in addition to the annual dues. In 2015, a one time $600 levy was paid by all members. The levy is currently $300.
Dental practice guidelines for all of dentistry have been created by the Association of Dental Surgeons (now the BC Dental Association). While these documents were not created for use in the legal arena, it is likely they will be used as a reference and for that reason they are included here. Please the College of Dental Surgeons website for more comprehensive information http://www.cdsbc.org/dentists_regulation/
Orthodontics is the branch of dental practice concerned with space maintenance, tooth guidance, interceptive procedures and full orthodontic procedures. The relationship between and among teeth and facial bones may be altered by the application of forces and/or stimulation and redirection of functional forces and treatment may be coordinated with surgical alteration of the jaw relationship. Fixed and/or removable appliances may be used.
All information in the sections on History & Clinical Examination, Diagnosis & Treatment Planning, and Management of Pain & Anxiety apply to orthodontic treatment and will not be discussed in detail in this section. Only those aspects that have specific importance for this area have been included. A satisfactory result in orthodontics is dependent upon the combination of professional skill and patient cooperation during all phases of treatment. The age of the patient, the severity of the presenting malocclusion, the desired treatment objectives, and individual osteogenic patterns occurring during treatment, will also determine the degree of success attained.
A practitioner must recognize the limits of her/his ability to diagnose and treat orthodontic cases. Consultation and/or referral for treatment to other dental professionals is appropriate when the nature of the disease, complexity of treatment or health of the patient is beyond the ability of the practitioner.
Diagnosis and treatment criteria should include recording of baseline conditions by means of:
• Any specific family history
• Radiographs including a lateral cephalogram and its analysis, a panoramic radiograph or full mouth survey when indicated
• Oriented study casts
• Photographs: intraoral, and full face and profile extraoral
• Other records as necessary
Orthodontic treatment should be in keeping with the patient's concerns and general and oral health. The ideal treatment plan may not always be possible or practical. The timing of orthodontic treatment is of particular importance. Orthodontic treatment may be initiated in the deciduous dentition, the mixed dentition and/or the adult dentition. Consideration must be given to minimizing the number of stages of orthodontic treatment. The patient and/or patient’s guardian must be informed of all phases of treatment proposed, their overall financial obligation, the patient compliance required and any limitations to the treatment planned.
All principles and practices of prevention should be employed during treatment. Plaque control should be given careful and continuous consideration and regular dental recall visits should continue. Active orthodontic treatment should be followed by retention appliances where applicable, along with supervision for a period of time to help maintain the stability of the correction.
The objectives of orthodontic treatment should be directed towards the attainment of an optimal result for each patient within the limits of the current treatment plan. Results should be aimed at: optimizing the supporting bone relationship, periodontal and odontogenic condition, arch form and occlusion while minimizing risks, such as gingival recession, loss of supporting bone, root resorption, and caries or decalcification of the teeth. The patient and/or guardian should be kept informed of any undesirable treatment effects. The completeness of post treatment records should be based on the complexity and magnitude of the treatment performed. Treatment objectives ideally include:
The BCSO has adopted the Scope of Practice statement of the American Association of Orthodontists:
Orthodontics/Dentofacial Orthopedics:
That area of dentistry concerned with the supervision, guidance and correction of the growing or mature dentofacial structures, including those conditions that require movement of the teeth or correction of malrelationships and malformations of their related structures and the adjustment of relationships between and among teeth and facial bones by the application of forces and/or the stimulation and redirection of functional forces within the craniofacial complex. Major responsibilities of orthodontic practice include the diagnosis, prevention, interception and treatment of all forms of malocclusion of the teeth and associated alterations of their surrounding structures; the design, application and control of functional and corrective appliances; and the guidance of the dentition and its supporting structures to attain and maintain optimal occlusal relations in physiological and esthetic harmony among facial and cranial structures.